Howard v. Cockrell
This text of 35 S.W.2d 884 (Howard v. Cockrell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion, op the Court by
Dismissing appeal.
• This is the second appeal of this case. The former appeal is reportedin 231 Ky. 278, 21 S. W. (2d) 455. We *505 therein held that both appellant and appellee had violated the Corrupt Practice Act (Ky. Stats., sec. 1565b-l et seq.), and that neither of them was entitled to a certificate of nomination to the office for which he was a candidate. The circuit court was directed to enter judgment in conformity to the opinion of this court. In addition to doing so, the circuit court adjudged that each party pay his own costs. Prom this judgment this appeal is prosecuted.
No appeal is allowed to this court from a judgment for costs. Siddens v. Ennis, Trustee, 217 Ky. 810, 290 S. W. 669; Ky. Stats., sec. 950-1.
Therefore this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
35 S.W.2d 884, 237 Ky. 504, 1931 Ky. LEXIS 634, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howard-v-cockrell-kyctapphigh-1931.