Howard v. City & County of San Francisco

51 Cal. 52
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1875
DocketNo. 3838
StatusPublished
Cited by20 cases

This text of 51 Cal. 52 (Howard v. City & County of San Francisco) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Howard v. City & County of San Francisco, 51 Cal. 52 (Cal. 1875).

Opinion

By the Court:

1. At common law, and in the absence of statutory provisions, the defendant, as being a municipal corporation, would not be liable for the negligence complained of in this action.

2. And we are of opinion that the provisions of the statute, under which the fire department of the city and county of San Francisco is organized and controlled, do not create a liability upon' the part of the city for acts of negligence committed by the officers or men of the department.

Judgment and order denying a new trial reversed and cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Varshock v. Department of Forestry
194 Cal. App. 4th 635 (California Court of Appeal, 2011)
Richardson v. City of Hannibal
50 S.W.2d 648 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1932)
Harding v. City of Hawthorne
300 P. 42 (California Court of Appeal, 1931)
Island Transp. Co. v. City of Seattle
205 F. 993 (W.D. Washington, 1913)
Long v. City of Birmingham
49 So. 881 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1909)
Davoust v. City of Alameda
84 P. 760 (California Supreme Court, 1906)
Peterson v. City of Wilmington
56 L.R.A. 959 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1902)
Frederick v. City of Columbus
3 Ohio N.P. 36 (Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division, 1895)
Mayor of New York v. Workman
67 F. 347 (Second Circuit, 1895)
Gillespie v. City of Lincoln
16 L.R.A. 349 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1892)
Chope v. City of Eureka
4 L.R.A. 325 (California Supreme Court, 1889)
Boyd v. Insurance Patrol of Philadelphia
113 Pa. 269 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1886)
Mendel & Co. v. City of Wheeling
28 W. Va. 233 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1886)
Grube v. City of St. Paul
26 N.W. 228 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1886)
Condict v. Mayor of Jersey City
46 N.J.L. 157 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1884)
Welsh v. Village of Rutland
56 Vt. 228 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1883)
Wilcox v. City of Chicago
107 Ill. 334 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1883)
Edgerly v. Concord
59 N.H. 78 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1879)
McKenna v. City of St. Louis
6 Mo. App. 320 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1878)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
51 Cal. 52, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howard-v-city-county-of-san-francisco-cal-1875.