Howard v. Boone

Supreme Court of Georgia

Howard v. Boone

162 S.E. 681, 174 Ga. 329, 1932 Ga. LEXIS 48

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Howard v. Boone. Read the opinion of the Court — 170 Ga. 156 →

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided February 10, 1932·No. No. 8742·Published

Opinion

Gilbert, J.

The exception is to a judgment of the superior court dismissing a petition for certiorari. The certiorari complains of a judgment of the court of ordinary refusing to set aside a judgment dismissing an administratrix. This court is without jurisdiction; and accordingly the ease is transferred to the Court of Appeals; which has jurisdiction. See Blount v. Brinson, 172 Ga. 663 (158 S. E. 527), which involved the same question. So ordered.

All the Justices concur. Fleming & Fleming and Wade H. Watson, for plaintiffs in error. M. G. Barwich and J. P. Highsmith, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gilbert, J.

The exception is to a judgment of the superior court dismissing a petition for certiorari. The certiorari complains of a judgment of the court of ordinary refusing to set aside a judgment dismissing an administratrix. This court is without jurisdiction; and accordingly the ease is transferred to the Court of Appeals; which has jurisdiction. See Blount v. Brinson, 172 Ga. 663 (158 S. E. 527), which involved the same question. So ordered.

All the Justices concur. Fleming & Fleming and Wade H. Watson, for plaintiffs in error. M. G. Barwich and J. P. Highsmith, contra.

Howard v. Boone, 162 S.E. 681, 174 Ga. 329, 1932 Ga. LEXIS 48 (Ga. 1932).

Pincite

162 S.E. 681 (Howard v. Boone) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related