Howard v. Boone

162 S.E. 681, 174 Ga. 329, 1932 Ga. LEXIS 48
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 10, 1932
DocketNo. 8742
StatusPublished

This text of 162 S.E. 681 (Howard v. Boone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Howard v. Boone, 162 S.E. 681, 174 Ga. 329, 1932 Ga. LEXIS 48 (Ga. 1932).

Opinion

Gilbert, J.

The exception is to a judgment of the superior court dismissing a petition for certiorari. The certiorari complains of a judgment of the court of ordinary refusing to set aside a judgment dismissing an administratrix. This court is without jurisdiction; and accordingly the ease is transferred to the Court of Appeals; which has jurisdiction. See Blount v. Brinson, 172 Ga. 663 (158 S. E. 527), which involved the same question. So ordered.

All the Justices concur. Fleming & Fleming and Wade H. Watson, for plaintiffs in error. M. G. Barwich and J. P. Highsmith, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Blount v. Brinson
158 S.E. 527 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1931)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
162 S.E. 681, 174 Ga. 329, 1932 Ga. LEXIS 48, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howard-v-boone-ga-1932.