Howard v. Achievement Preparatory Academy Public Charter School

District of Columbia

Howard v. Achievement Preparatory Academy Public Charter School

CourtDistrict Court, District of Columbia

DecidedMarch 28, 2016

DocketCivil Action No. 2015-0199

StatusPublished

This text of Howard v. Achievement Preparatory Academy Public Charter School (Howard v. Achievement Preparatory Academy Public Charter School) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Howard v. Achievement Preparatory Academy Public Charter School, (D.D.C. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

SHANTE HOWARD, As Parent and Next Friend of R.T., et al., Plaintiffs

v. Civil Action No. 15-199 (CKK/GMH) ACHIEVEMENT PREPARATORY ACADEMY PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL, Defendant

MEMORANDUM OPINION (March 28, 2016) On March 8, 2016, the Magistrate Judge G. Michael Harvey’s Report and Recommendation was entered, and the parties were allowed 14 days to file objections to the recommendations made by the magistrate judge. No objections have been filed as of this date. Upon careful consideration of the record in this case and of Magistrate Judge Harvey’s [20] Report and Recommendation, the Court ADOPTS and ACCEPTS the Report and Recommendation in full. The Court shall GRANT-IN-PART and DENY-IN-PART Plaintiffs’ [13] Motion for Summary Judgment and shall GRANT-IN-PART and DENY-IN-PART Defendant’s [15] Cross Motion for Summary Judgment. The Court shall award Plaintiffs $15,189.54 in attorney’s fees and costs. An appropriate Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

/s/ COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

SHANTE HOWARD, As Parent and Next Friend of R.T., et al., Plaintiffs

v. Civil Action No. 15-199 (CKK/GMH) ACHIEVEMENT PREPARATORY ACADEMY PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL, Defendant

MEMORANDUM OPINION (March 28, 2016) On March 8, 2016, the Magistrate Judge G. Michael Harvey’s Report and Recommendation was entered, and the parties were allowed 14 days to file objections to the recommendations made by the magistrate judge. No objections have been filed as of this date. Upon careful consideration of the record in this case and of Magistrate Judge Harvey’s [20] Report and Recommendation, the Court ADOPTS and ACCEPTS the Report and Recommendation in full. The Court shall GRANT-IN-PART and DENY-IN-PART Plaintiffs’ [13] Motion for Summary Judgment and shall GRANT-IN-PART and DENY-IN-PART Defendant’s [15] Cross Motion for Summary Judgment. The Court shall award Plaintiffs $15,189.54 in attorney’s fees and costs. An appropriate Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

/s/ COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY United States District Judge

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Howard v. Achievement Preparatory Academy Public Charter School, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howard-v-achievement-preparatory-academy-public-charter-school-dcd-2016.