Howard v. Abingdon

Fourth Circuit

Howard v. Abingdon

552 F. App'x 265

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 27, 2014

DocketNo. 13-2394

StatusPublished

This text of 552 F. App'x 265 (Howard v. Abingdon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Howard v. Abingdon, 552 F. App'x 265 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Andre J. Howard appeals the district court’s order striking Howard’s complaint from the docket. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Howard v. Abingdon, VA, No. l:13-mc-00076-JPJ (W.D.Va. Oct. 21, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Andre J. Howard appeals the district court’s order striking Howard’s complaint from the docket. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Howard v. Abingdon, VA, No. l:13-mc-00076-JPJ (W.D.Va. Oct. 21, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

552 F. App'x 265, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howard-v-abingdon-ca4-2014.