Howard University Hospital v. Louis W. Sullivan, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services

923 F.2d 201, 1990 WL 256317
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedDecember 14, 1990
Docket89-5442
StatusUnpublished

This text of 923 F.2d 201 (Howard University Hospital v. Louis W. Sullivan, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Howard University Hospital v. Louis W. Sullivan, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, 923 F.2d 201, 1990 WL 256317 (D.C. Cir. 1990).

Opinion

923 F.2d 201

287 U.S.App.D.C. 378

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.
HOWARD UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL
v.
Louis W. SULLIVAN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human
Services, et al., Appellants.

No. 89-5442.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Dec. 14, 1990.

Before MIKVA, RUTH B. ADER GINSBURG and CLARENCE THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the motion for summary affirmance, the response thereto and the reply, and the motion to withdraw appeal in part and for an order holding remainder of appeal in abeyance, it is

ORDERED that the motion to withdraw appeal in part be granted. The motion for holding remainder of appeal in abeyance is dismissed as moot because the time period in which the Secretary may file a petition for a writ of certiorari in the U.S. Supreme Court has passed. See 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2101 (1988). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the motion for summary affirmance be granted as to the issue of the applicable interest rate. See St. Agnes Hospital, et al. v. Sullivan, 905 F.2d 1563 (D.C.Cir.1990).

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C.Cir.Rule 15.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
923 F.2d 201, 1990 WL 256317, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howard-university-hospital-v-louis-w-sullivan-md-s-cadc-1990.