Howard U. Shields, III v. G. Whitfield, Sr. Warden Texas State Prison R. Marez, Asst. Warden Texas State Prison G. SanMiguel, Corrections/Safety Officer Individually and in Their Official Capacities

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJuly 31, 2023
Docket08-23-00078-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Howard U. Shields, III v. G. Whitfield, Sr. Warden Texas State Prison R. Marez, Asst. Warden Texas State Prison G. SanMiguel, Corrections/Safety Officer Individually and in Their Official Capacities (Howard U. Shields, III v. G. Whitfield, Sr. Warden Texas State Prison R. Marez, Asst. Warden Texas State Prison G. SanMiguel, Corrections/Safety Officer Individually and in Their Official Capacities) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Howard U. Shields, III v. G. Whitfield, Sr. Warden Texas State Prison R. Marez, Asst. Warden Texas State Prison G. SanMiguel, Corrections/Safety Officer Individually and in Their Official Capacities, (Tex. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS

HOWARD U. SHIELDS, III, § No. 08-23-00078-CV

Appellant, § Appeal from the

v. § 112th Judicial District Court

G. WHITFIELD, SR. WARDEN TEXAS § of Pecos County, Texas STATE PRISON R. MAREZ, ASST. WARDEN TEXAS STATE PRISON G. § (TC# P-12492-112-CV) SANMIGUEL, CORRECTIONS/SAFETY OFFICER INDIVIDUALLY AND IN THEIR OFFICIAL CAPACITIES,

Appellees.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This appeal is before the Court on its own motion to determine whether it should be

dismissed for want of prosecution.

On June 26, 2023, the Clerk of the Court notified Appellant that it recognized Appellant’s

indigency status, that his brief was past due, and that no motion for extension of time to file a brief

had been filed. The letter informed Appellant of the Court’s intent to dismiss the appeal for want

of prosecution without further notice unless Appellant filed a brief by July 26, 2023. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 38.8. To date, Appellant has not responded to the Court’s letter or filed an appellant’s brief.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c).

LISA J. SOTO, Justice

July 31, 2023

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox, and Soto, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Howard U. Shields, III v. G. Whitfield, Sr. Warden Texas State Prison R. Marez, Asst. Warden Texas State Prison G. SanMiguel, Corrections/Safety Officer Individually and in Their Official Capacities, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howard-u-shields-iii-v-g-whitfield-sr-warden-texas-state-prison-r-texapp-2023.