Howard Towing Ass'n v. The J. E. Potts

N.D. Illinois

Howard Towing Ass'n v. The J. E. Potts

54 F. 539, 1893 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29

DecidedFebruary 23, 1893

StatusPublished

This text of 54 F. 539 (Howard Towing Ass'n v. The J. E. Potts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Howard Towing Ass'n v. The J. E. Potts, 54 F. 539, 1893 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29 (N.D. Ill. 1893).

Pincite

Opinion

GROSSGTJP, District Judge.

The libel in this case is for services rendered in pulling the barge Potts off the beach at Aorth Fox island, in Lake Michigan. The claim is for $750, and a number of witnesses have testified that that, under the circumstances, would be a reasonable amount. The defense is that subsequent to the services the owner of the Potts entered into negotiations with the representatives of the libelants, which resulted in the execution of notes amounting to $600 in full payment of the services. The claim is also made that the delivery and aeeptance of these notes operated as a waiver of libelant’s lien upon the barge saved. The testimony respecting the execution of these notes, and their purpose, is limited to two witnesses! I can see no reason in their testimony why one should be given greater credence than the other. Where a lien for salvage has once attached, and notes have been given for the services, the burden of proof is upon the party alleging that these notes were intended to detach the lien to show that fact. Under this rule, I am of the opinion that the delivery and acceptance of these notes is not shown to have been intended to detach the lien.

I think, however, that the acceptance of these notes, in the absence of proof to the contrary, shows that the amount agreed upon is the proper salvage, and, accordingly, that the libelant’s claim is limited to $600. The decree, therefore, will be in favor of the libel-ant for $600, with a lien upon the barge for its payment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GROSSGTJP, District Judge.

The libel in this case is for services rendered in pulling the barge Potts off the beach at Aorth Fox island, in Lake Michigan. The claim is for $750, and a number of witnesses have testified that that, under the circumstances, would be a reasonable amount. The defense is that subsequent to the services the owner of the Potts entered into negotiations with the representatives of the libelants, which resulted in the execution of notes amounting to $600 in full payment of the services. The claim is also made that the delivery and aeeptance of these notes operated as a waiver of libelant’s lien upon the barge saved. The testimony respecting the execution of these notes, and their purpose, is limited to two witnesses! I can see no reason in their testimony why one should be given greater credence than the other. Where a lien for salvage has once attached, and notes have been given for the services, the burden of proof is upon the party alleging that these notes were intended to detach the lien to show that fact. Under this rule, I am of the opinion that the delivery and acceptance of these notes is not shown to have been intended to detach the lien.

I think, however, that the acceptance of these notes, in the absence of proof to the contrary, shows that the amount agreed upon is the proper salvage, and, accordingly, that the libelant’s claim is limited to $600. The decree, therefore, will be in favor of the libel-ant for $600, with a lien upon the barge for its payment.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

54 F. 539, 1893 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howard-towing-assn-v-the-j-e-potts-ilnd-1893.