Howard, Tenika

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 24, 2022
DocketWR-93,975-01
StatusPublished

This text of Howard, Tenika (Howard, Tenika) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Howard, Tenika, (Tex. 2022).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-93,975-01

EX PARTE TENIKA HOWARD, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 19CR-201 IN THE 349TH DISTRICT COURT FROM HOUSTON COUNTY

Per curiam.

OR D ER

Applicant pleaded guilty to possession of a controlled substance PG 1 > 4G < 200G in a drug free

zone and was sentenced to six years’ imprisonment. Applicant did not appeal her conviction. Applicant

filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk forwarded

it to this Court. See TEX. CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07.

Applicant contends that her plea was involuntary because she was not informed that her conviction

would be treated as a “3g” offense for purposes of parole eligibility. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true,

might entitle her to relief. Brady v. United States, 397 U.S. 742 (1970). Accordingly, the record should

be developed. The trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. TEX. CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 2

11.07, § 3(d). The trial court shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claim. In developing the

record, the trial court may use any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). If the trial court elects to hold

a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wants to be

represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to represent her at the hearing. See TEX. CODE

CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04. If counsel is appointed or retained, the trial court shall immediately notify this

Court of counsel’s name.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether Applicant’s plea was

involuntary. The trial court shall make findings stating whether Applicant’s conviction is being treated as

a “3g” offense for purposes of parole eligibility, and whether trial counsel told Applicant that it was a “3g”

offense and explained what that meant. The trial court may make any other findings and conclusions that

it deems appropriate in response to Applicant’s claim.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from the date

of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s findings and

conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things, affidavits, motions,

objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from hearings and depositions. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested by the trial court and obtained from

this Court.

Filed: August 24, 2022 Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brady v. United States
397 U.S. 742 (Supreme Court, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Howard, Tenika, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howard-tenika-texcrimapp-2022.