Howard Tempy Dearhart, Jr. v. Virginia
This text of 374 U.S. 498 (Howard Tempy Dearhart, Jr. v. Virginia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
83 S.Ct. 1876
10 L.Ed.2d 1044
Howard Tempy DEARHART, Jr.
v.
VIRGINIA.
No. 48, Misc.
Supreme Court of the United States
June 17, 1963
Howard Tempy Dearhart, Jr., pro se.
Reno S. Harp III, Asst. Atty. Gen., of Virginia, for respondent.
On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia.
PER CURIAM.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353, 83 S.Ct. 814, 9 L.Ed.2d 811.
Mr. Justice CLARK and Mr. Justice HARLAN dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 358, 360, 83 S.Ct. 817, 818.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
374 U.S. 498, 83 S. Ct. 1876, 10 L. Ed. 2d 1044, 1963 U.S. LEXIS 998, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howard-tempy-dearhart-jr-v-virginia-scotus-1963.