Howard & Ryckman v. McKnight
25 Wend. 688
This text of 25 Wend. 688 (Howard & Ryckman v. McKnight) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Howard & Ryckman v. McKnight, 25 Wend. 688 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1841).
Opinion
By the Court,
The motion is irregular. The defendant should have demanded the costs as taxed, and if not paid, might have made this motion. 6 Wendell, 522. Unless the plaintiffs, however, pay the amount of the taxed bill, deduciing the costs of opposing this motion, let judgment as in case of nonsuit, be entered.
Ordered accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Sage v. Robbins
8 Cow. 110 (New York Supreme Court, 1828)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
25 Wend. 688, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howard-ryckman-v-mcknight-nysupct-1841.