Howard & Ryckman v. McKnight

25 Wend. 688
New York Supreme Court·Decided July 15, 1841·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

By the Court,

Nelson, C. J.

The motion is irregular. The defendant should have demanded the costs as taxed, and if not paid, might have made this motion. 6 Wendell, 522. Unless the plaintiffs, however, pay the amount of the taxed bill, deduciing the costs of opposing this motion, let judgment as in case of nonsuit, be entered.

Ordered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Howard & Ryckman v. McKnight, 25 Wend. 688 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1841).

25 Wend. 688 (Howard & Ryckman v. McKnight) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sage v. Robbins
8 Cow. 110 (New York Supreme Court, 1828)