Home/Fifth Circuit/Howard Rudolph and Linda Magoon Rudolph v. Dr. Sandra Robinson, Ben Meyers

Howard Rudolph and Linda Magoon Rudolph v. Dr. Sandra Robinson, Ben Meyers

866 F.2d 797, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 2344, 1989 WL 10659
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedMarch 1, 1989
Docket88-3384
StatusPublished

This text of 866 F.2d 797 (Howard Rudolph and Linda Magoon Rudolph v. Dr. Sandra Robinson, Ben Meyers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Howard Rudolph and Linda Magoon Rudolph v. Dr. Sandra Robinson, Ben Meyers, 866 F.2d 797, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 2344, 1989 WL 10659 (5th Cir. 1989).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Good cause existed for setting aside the default in this case involving the welfare of small children, and the trial judge properly-abstained from exercising jurisdiction in factual circumstances all but identical to those presented in Moore v. Sims, 442 U.S. 415, 99 S.Ct. 2371, 60 L.Ed.2d 994 (1979).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Moore v. Sims
442 U.S. 415 (Supreme Court, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
866 F.2d 797, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 2344, 1989 WL 10659, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howard-rudolph-and-linda-magoon-rudolph-v-dr-sandra-robinson-ben-meyers-ca5-1989.