Howard, Precious Lamont

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided January 14, 2009·No. PD-1730-08·Published

Opinion



IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS



NOS. PD-1729-08, PD-1730-08 & PD-1731-08

PRECIOUS LAMONT HOWARD, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS


ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

FROM THE FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

FORT BEND COUNTY



Per curiam. KEASLER and HERVEY, JJ., dissent.


ORDER

           The petition for discretionary review violates Rule of Appellate Procedure 68.4(i) because the original petition does not contain a complete copy of the opinion of the court of appeals.

           The petition is struck. See Rule of Appellate Procedure 68.6.

           The petitioner may redraw the petition. The redrawn petition and copies must be filed in the Court of Criminal Appeals within thirty days after the date of this order.

En banc

Delivered: January 14, 2009.

Do Not Publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Howard, Precious Lamont, (Tex. 2009).

Howard, Precious Lamont (Howard, Precious Lamont) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.