Howard M. Rosenstein v. The City of Dallas, Texas

884 F.2d 174, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 15216, 1989 WL 101842

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Howard M. Rosenstein v. The City of Dallas, Texas. Read the opinion of the Court — 876 F.2d 392 →

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided September 7, 1989·No. 87-1888·Published

Opinion

ON SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Before CLARK, Chief Judge, GEE, REAVLEY, POLITZ, KING, JOHNSON, WILLIAMS, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, and DUHE, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Before CLARK, Chief Judge, GEE, REAVLEY, POLITZ, KING, JOHNSON, WILLIAMS, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, and DUHE, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

Howard M. Rosenstein v. The City of Dallas, Texas, 884 F.2d 174, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 15216, 1989 WL 101842 (5th Cir. 1989).

Pincite

884 F.2d 174 (Howard M. Rosenstein v. The City of Dallas, Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Howard M. Rosenstein v. The City of Dallas, Texas

876 F.2d 392 (Fifth Circuit, 1989)

United States v. Ernest Michael Wilson

884 F.2d 174 (Fifth Circuit, 1989)

Opinion

Related