Howard L. Jones, and v. State Farm Mutual Insurance Company

Ninth Circuit

Howard L. Jones, and v. State Farm Mutual Insurance Company

457 F.2d 794, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 10926

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedMarch 6, 1972

Docket25604

StatusPublished

This text of 457 F.2d 794 (Howard L. Jones, and v. State Farm Mutual Insurance Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Howard L. Jones, and v. State Farm Mutual Insurance Company, 457 F.2d 794, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 10926 (9th Cir. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of the district court denying coverage by State Farm Mutual (on its policy issued to Price, employer of Purdom, the driver of the pick-up truck that injured plaintiff Jones) is affirmed.

The pick-up was owned by Purdom and he was engaged in the business of Price at the time of the accident.

We agree with the district court that the business exclusion clause of State Farm Mutual’s policy lets State Farm Mutual escape.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of the district court denying coverage by State Farm Mutual (on its policy issued to Price, employer of Purdom, the driver of the pick-up truck that injured plaintiff Jones) is affirmed.

The pick-up was owned by Purdom and he was engaged in the business of Price at the time of the accident.

We agree with the district court that the business exclusion clause of State Farm Mutual’s policy lets State Farm Mutual escape.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

457 F.2d 794, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 10926, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howard-l-jones-and-v-state-farm-mutual-insurance-company-ca9-1972.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack