Howard L. Childs v. Norman D. Hayward
This text of 943 F.2d 57 (Howard L. Childs v. Norman D. Hayward) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
943 F.2d 57
NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order.
Howard L. CHILDS, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Norman D. HAYWARD, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 91-4023.
United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.
Sept. 4, 1991.
After examining the briefs, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 34.1.9. Therefore, the case is ordered submitted without oral argument.
For the reasons stated in the District Court's Order of January 8, 1991, we AFFIRM.
This order and judgment has no precedential value and shall not be cited, or used by any court within the Tenth Circuit, except for purposes of establishing the doctrines of the law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. 10th Cir.R. 36.3
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
943 F.2d 57, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 25912, 1991 WL 172647, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howard-l-childs-v-norman-d-hayward-ca10-1991.