Howard Johnson Co. v. Limauge
This text of 549 So. 2d 1093 (Howard Johnson Co. v. Limauge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The judgment under review is reversed only with respect to the individual defendants H.W. Prahl, Jr. and R.A. Prahl. See McDaniel v. Sheffield, 431 So.2d 230 (Fla. [1094]*10941st DCA 1983), review denied, 440 So.2d 352 (Fla.1983). Since there is no other harmful error, the judgment against the remaining defendant-appellants is affirmed. Orlando Executive Park, Inc. v. Robbins, 433 So.2d 491 (Fla.1983); Crinkley v. Holiday Inns, Inc., 844 F.2d 156 (4th Cir.1988); Metropolitan Dade County v. Cox, 453 So.2d 1171 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); Sears v. Southern Pac. Co., 313 F.2d 498 (9th Cir. 1963); Walt Disney World Co. v. Wood, 515 So.2d 198 (Fla.1987); § 59.041, Fla. Stat. (1987).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
549 So. 2d 1093, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5240, 1989 WL 110939, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howard-johnson-co-v-limauge-fladistctapp-1989.