Howard Johnson Co. v. Limauge
Opinion
The judgment under review is reversed only with respect to the individual defendants H.W. Prahl, Jr. and R.A. Prahl. See McDaniel v. Sheffield, 431 So.2d 230 (Fla. [1094]*10941st DCA 1983), review denied, 440 So.2d 352 (Fla.1983). Since there is no other harmful error, the judgment against the remaining defendant-appellants is affirmed. Orlando Executive Park, Inc. v. Robbins, 433 So.2d 491 (Fla.1983); Crinkley v. Holiday Inns, Inc., 844 F.2d 156 (4th Cir.1988); Metropolitan Dade County v. Cox, 453 So.2d 1171 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); Sears v. Southern Pac. Co., 313 F.2d 498 (9th Cir. 1963); Walt Disney World Co. v. Wood, 515 So.2d 198 (Fla.1987); § 59.041, Fla. Stat. (1987).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
549 So. 2d 1093 (Howard Johnson Co. v. Limauge) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.