Howard James Redmond, Jr. v. American Express National Bank
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
No. 07-26-00050-CV
HOWARD REDMOND, JR., APPELLANT
V.
AMERICAN EXPRESS NATIONAL BANK, APPELLEE
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 Denton County, Texas Trial Court No. CV-2023-02023, Honorable Robert Ramirez, Presiding
May 20, 2026 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before PARKER, C.J., and DOSS and PRATT, JJ.
Appellant, Howard Redmond, Jr., proceeding pro se, appeals from the trial court’s
Summary Judgment.1 Appellant’s brief was originally due April 13, 2026, but was not
filed. By letter of April 22, 2026, we notified Appellant that the appeal was subject to
dismissal for want of prosecution, without further notice, if a brief was not received by May
1 Originally appealed to the Second Court of Appeals, this appeal was transferred to this Court by
the Texas Supreme Court pursuant to its docket equalization efforts. See TEX. GOV’T CODE § 73.001. 4, 2026. To date, Appellant has neither filed a brief nor had any further communication
with this Court.
Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P.
38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b).
Per Curiam
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Howard James Redmond, Jr. v. American Express National Bank (Howard James Redmond, Jr. v. American Express National Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.