Howard Hildebrandt v. United States

First Circuit

Howard Hildebrandt v. United States

223 F.2d 924, 1955 U.S. App. LEXIS 4040

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Howard Hildebrandt v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 216 F.2d 616 →

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided July 8, 1955·No. 5001_1·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of appellee’s motion to dismiss or affirm under our Rule 26(3) and memorandum in support thereof, and of appellant’s reply memorandum in opposition thereto, and further upon consideration of appellant’s brief on the merits and of the record on appeal consisting of the original papers, and it appearing that no substantial question is presented by this appeal,

It is ordered that the orders appealed from be and the same hereby are affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of appellee’s motion to dismiss or affirm under our Rule 26(3) and memorandum in support thereof, and of appellant’s reply memorandum in opposition thereto, and further upon consideration of appellant’s brief on the merits and of the record on appeal consisting of the original papers, and it appearing that no substantial question is presented by this appeal,

It is ordered that the orders appealed from be and the same hereby are affirmed.

Howard Hildebrandt v. United States, 223 F.2d 924, 1955 U.S. App. LEXIS 4040 (1st Cir. 1955).

Pincite

223 F.2d 924 (Howard Hildebrandt v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.