Howard Hildebrandt v. United States
This text of 223 F.2d 924 (Howard Hildebrandt v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Upon consideration of appellee’s motion to dismiss or affirm under our Rule 26(3) and memorandum in support thereof, and of appellant’s reply memorandum in opposition thereto, and further upon consideration of appellant’s brief on the merits and of the record on appeal consisting of the original papers, and it appearing that no substantial question is presented by this appeal,
It is ordered that the orders appealed from be and the same hereby are affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
223 F.2d 924, 1955 U.S. App. LEXIS 4040, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howard-hildebrandt-v-united-states-ca1-1955.