Howard, Ex Parte Daniel Patrick

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 3, 2010
DocketAP-76,306
StatusPublished

This text of Howard, Ex Parte Daniel Patrick (Howard, Ex Parte Daniel Patrick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Howard, Ex Parte Daniel Patrick, (Tex. 2010).

Opinion



IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS




NO. AP-76,306




EX PARTE DANIEL PATRICK HOWARD, Applicant





ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. F-0155310-I IN CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 2

FROM DALLAS COUNTY




           Per curiam.


O P I N I O N


            Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of capital murder and sentenced to life imprisonment. The Fifth Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Howard v. State, No. 05-02-01731-CR (Tex. App.–Dallas 2003, no pet.).

            Applicant contends that his appellate counsel rendered ineffective assistance because he failed to timely notify Applicant that his conviction had been affirmed. The trial court made findings of fact and concluded that through no fault of appellate counsel Applicant was denied his right to file a pro se petition for discretionary review. The trial court recommends that relief be granted. We find, therefore, that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time petition for discretionary review of the judgment of the Fifth Court of Appeals in Cause No. 05-02-01731-CR that affirmed his conviction in Case No. F-0155310-I from Criminal District Court No. 2 of Dallas County. Applicant shall file his petition for discretionary review with the Fifth Court of Appeals within 30 days of the date on which this Court’s mandate issues. Applicant’s other claims are dismissed. Ex parte Torres, 943 S.W.2d 469 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997).

Delivered: March 3, 2010

Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Torres
943 S.W.2d 469 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1997)
Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Howard, Ex Parte Daniel Patrick, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howard-ex-parte-daniel-patrick-texcrimapp-2010.