Howard E. Leigh v. R. J. Gaffney, Warden, Kansas State Penitentiary, Lansing, Kansas

436 F.2d 976, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 6484
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Howard E. Leigh v. R. J. Gaffney, Warden, Kansas State Penitentiary, Lansing, Kansas. Read the opinion of the Court — 432 F.2d 923
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit·Decided November 11, 1970·No. 427-70_1·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Leigh was notified that the court was considering summary affirmance and he has taken the opportunity afforded him to file a memorandum addressing the merits of the cause and opposing such disposition. It is apparent from the record that Leigh is confined in the Kansas State Penitentiary and we have accordingly substituted the warden thereof as the proper respondent-appellee. An examination of the file and records in this cause prompts the conclusion that the questions presented have been correctly determined by the district court and that they are so unsubstantial as not to warrant further argument.

Accordingly, the motion of appellee is granted and the judgment of the District Court is affirmed for the reasons stated in the Memorandum and Order of the district court, 321 F.Supp. 195 (D. Kan., 1970).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Howard E. Leigh v. R. J. Gaffney, Warden, Kansas State Penitentiary, Lansing, Kansas, 436 F.2d 976, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 6484 (10th Cir. 1970).

436 F.2d 976 (Howard E. Leigh v. R. J. Gaffney, Warden, Kansas State Penitentiary, Lansing, Kansas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Leigh v. Kansas
321 F. Supp. 195 (D. Kansas, 1970)