Howard Delivery Service, Inc. v. Zurich American Insurance (In Re Howard Delivery Service, Inc.)

403 F.3d 228
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMarch 24, 2005
Docket04-1136
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 403 F.3d 228 (Howard Delivery Service, Inc. v. Zurich American Insurance (In Re Howard Delivery Service, Inc.)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Howard Delivery Service, Inc. v. Zurich American Insurance (In Re Howard Delivery Service, Inc.), 403 F.3d 228 (4th Cir. 2005).

Opinions

Reversed and remanded by published per curiam opinion. Judge KING wrote an opinion concurring in the judgment, Judge SHEDD wrote an opinion concurring in the judgment, and Judge NIEMEYER wrote an opinion dissenting from the judgment.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

This appeal presents the question of whether the claim made by Zurich American Insurance Company against the estate of the debtor, Howard Delivery Service, Inc., for unpaid workers’ compensation insurance premiums is to be given priority by reason of § 507(a)(4) of the Bankruptcy Code. The court holds that Zurich’s claim is entitled to priority under § 507(a)(4) and therefore reverses the decision of the district court and remands the case for such further proceedings as may be appropriate.

REVERSED AND REMANDED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
403 F.3d 228, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howard-delivery-service-inc-v-zurich-american-insurance-in-re-howard-ca4-2005.