Howard Delivery Service, Inc. v. Zurich American Insurance (In Re Howard Delivery Service, Inc.)

403 F.3d 228
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 24, 2005·No. 04-1136·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

Reversed and remanded by published per curiam opinion. Judge KING wrote an opinion concurring in the judgment, Judge SHEDD wrote an opinion concurring in the judgment, and Judge NIEMEYER wrote an opinion dissenting from the judgment.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

This appeal presents the question of whether the claim made by Zurich American Insurance Company against the estate of the debtor, Howard Delivery Service, Inc., for unpaid workers’ compensation insurance premiums is to be given priority by reason of § 507(a)(4) of the Bankruptcy Code. The court holds that Zurich’s claim is entitled to priority under § 507(a)(4) and therefore reverses the decision of the district court and remands the case for such further proceedings as may be appropriate.

REVERSED AND REMANDED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Howard Delivery Service, Inc. v. Zurich American Insurance (In Re Howard Delivery Service, Inc.), 403 F.3d 228 (4th Cir. 2005).

403 F.3d 228 (Howard Delivery Service, Inc. v. Zurich American Insurance (In Re Howard Delivery Service, Inc.)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related