Howard C. Good v. United States

Fifth Circuit

Howard C. Good v. United States

415 F.2d 771, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 10964

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedAugust 28, 1969

Docket26082

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 415 F.2d 771 (Howard C. Good v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Howard C. Good v. United States, 415 F.2d 771, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 10964 (5th Cir. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM:

Appellant having been convicted of violation of 21 U.S.C. § 174 and 26 U.S.C. § 4704, involving heroin, contends in his petition for rehearing that his conviction should be reversed because of Leary v. United States, May 19, 1969, 395 U.S. 6, 89 S.Ct. 1532, 23 L.Ed.2d 57, and United States v. Covington, May 19, 1969, 395 U.S. 57, 89 S.Ct. 1559, 23 L.Ed.2d 94. Appellant’s contention is without merit. Leary v. United States, 89 S.Ct. 1532, 1553 n. 92; United States v. Walker, 5th Cir. 1969, 414 F.2d 876; United States v. Lugo-Baez, 8th Cir. 1969, 412 F.2d 435; United States v. Perea, 10th Cir. 1969, 413 F.2d 65.

Therefore, it is ordered that the petition for rehearing in the above entitled and numbered cause be, and the same is hereby, denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM:

Appellant having been convicted of violation of 21 U.S.C. § 174 and 26 U.S.C. § 4704, involving heroin, contends in his petition for rehearing that his conviction should be reversed because of Leary v. United States, May 19, 1969, 395 U.S. 6, 89 S.Ct. 1532, 23 L.Ed.2d 57, and United States v. Covington, May 19, 1969, 395 U.S. 57, 89 S.Ct. 1559, 23 L.Ed.2d 94. Appellant’s contention is without merit. Leary v. United States, 89 S.Ct. 1532, 1553 n. 92; United States v. Walker, 5th Cir. 1969, 414 F.2d 876; United States v. Lugo-Baez, 8th Cir. 1969, 412 F.2d 435; United States v. Perea, 10th Cir. 1969, 413 F.2d 65.

Therefore, it is ordered that the petition for rehearing in the above entitled and numbered cause be, and the same is hereby, denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

415 F.2d 771, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 10964, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howard-c-good-v-united-states-ca5-1969.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack