Howard (Abdul) Vs. Dist. Ct. (State)
This text of Howard (Abdul) Vs. Dist. Ct. (State) (Howard (Abdul) Vs. Dist. Ct. (State)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
ABDUL HOWARD, No. 80016 Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, F IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK, Respondent, JAN and EL' 7;i10t4IN cLER COURT THE STATE OF NEVADA, BY Real Party in Interest. DEFTLYi7
ORDER DENYING PETITION This pro se petition for a writ of audita querela challenges petitioner's sex offender registration. Without deciding whether this court recognizes the writ of audita querela or the scope of that writ, we decline to exercise our original jurisdiction to consider this petition. Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.'
, C.J. Pickering
, Sr. J. Douglas
CC: Chief Judge, The Eighth Judicial District Court Abdul Howard Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk
"The Honorable Michael Douglas, Senior Justice, participated in the decision of this matter under a general order of assignment. SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
I947A 4/4. (133qg
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Howard (Abdul) Vs. Dist. Ct. (State), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/howard-abdul-vs-dist-ct-state-nev-2020.