How v. How

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

How v. How

5 Mass. 375

CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

DecidedSeptember 15, 1809

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 5 Mass. 375 (How v. How) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

How v. How, 5 Mass. 375 (Mass. 1809).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court. This cannot be granted upon motion. When an appellant fails in the prosecution of his appeal to effect, and the adverse party would have the benefit of the decree below, he must file his complaint, praying for affirmation and costs.

[293]*293Afterwards, Lincoln filed a complaint, and the Court affirmed the decree of the judge of probate, awarded costs for the respondent, and ordered a transcript of the record to be sent to the judge of probate for his government.

Blake, for the appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court. This cannot be granted upon motion. When an appellant fails in the prosecution of his appeal to effect, and the adverse party would have the benefit of the decree below, he must file his complaint, praying for affirmation and costs.

[293]*293Afterwards, Lincoln filed a complaint, and the Court affirmed the decree of the judge of probate, awarded costs for the respondent, and ordered a transcript of the record to be sent to the judge of probate for his government.

Blake, for the appellant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

5 Mass. 375, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/how-v-how-mass-1809.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack