Hovis v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Hovis v. State

291 S.W.3d 856, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1252, 2009 WL 2870212

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 8, 2009

DocketED 92011

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 291 S.W.3d 856 (Hovis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hovis v. State, 291 S.W.3d 856, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1252, 2009 WL 2870212 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Randy D. Hovis appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying, without an evi-dentiary hearing, his amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence filed pursuant to Rule 24.035. 1 We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

1

. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P. 2008, unless otherwise indicated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Randy D. Hovis appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying, without an evi-dentiary hearing, his amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence filed pursuant to Rule 24.035. 1 We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

1

. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P. 2008, unless otherwise indicated.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

291 S.W.3d 856, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1252, 2009 WL 2870212, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hovis-v-state-moctapp-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack