Hovey v. Wark-Gilbert Co.
This text of 227 N.W. 543 (Hovey v. Wark-Gilbert Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff sued on the note of defendant, a Michigan corporation, due October 22, 1928, and had judgment which defendant reviews on error.
Act No. 335, Pub. Acts 1927, pt. 2, chap. 1, § 1, provided that "no corporation shall interpose the defense of usury to any cause of action hereafter arising."
The cause of action arose when the note became due. The act was then in effect. Defendant sought *Page 503
to interpose the sole defense of usury. This the act forbids.Miller v. Reid,
NORTH, C.J., and FEAD, BUTZEL, WIEST, McDONALD, POTTER, and SHARPE, JJ., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
227 N.W. 543, 248 Mich. 502, 1929 Mich. LEXIS 597, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hovey-v-wark-gilbert-co-mich-1929.