Hovey v. Richardson
147 A.D. 892, 133 N.Y.S. 33, 1911 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2980
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 29, 1911
StatusPublished
This text of 147 A.D. 892 (Hovey v. Richardson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hovey v. Richardson, 147 A.D. 892, 133 N.Y.S. 33, 1911 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2980 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1911).
Opinion
For the reasons stated in the prevailing opinion,. herewith handed down, in Hovey v. De Long Hook & Eye Co. (147 App. Div. 881) the determination of the Appellate Term should be affirmed, with costs.
Present—Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Clarke, Scott and Miller, JJ. Miller and Scott, JJ., dissented.
Determination affirmed, 'with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Hovey v. De Long Hook & Eye Co.
147 A.D. 881 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1911)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
147 A.D. 892, 133 N.Y.S. 33, 1911 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2980, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hovey-v-richardson-nyappdiv-1911.