Hovey v. Richardson

147 A.D. 892, 133 N.Y.S. 33, 1911 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2980

Opinion

Per Curiam:

For the reasons stated in the prevailing opinion,. herewith handed down, in Hovey v. De Long Hook & Eye Co. (147 App. Div. 881) the determination of the Appellate Term should be affirmed, with costs.

Present—Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Clarke, Scott and Miller, JJ. Miller and Scott, JJ., dissented.

Determination affirmed, 'with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hovey v. Richardson, 147 A.D. 892, 133 N.Y.S. 33, 1911 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2980 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1911).

147 A.D. 892 (Hovey v. Richardson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hovey v. De Long Hook & Eye Co.
147 A.D. 881 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1911)