Hovey v. Richardson
147 A.D. 892, 133 N.Y.S. 33, 1911 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2980
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 29, 1911·Published
Opinion
For the reasons stated in the prevailing opinion,. herewith handed down, in Hovey v. De Long Hook & Eye Co. (147 App. Div. 881) the determination of the Appellate Term should be affirmed, with costs.
Present—Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Clarke, Scott and Miller, JJ. Miller and Scott, JJ., dissented.
Determination affirmed, 'with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hovey v. Richardson, 147 A.D. 892, 133 N.Y.S. 33, 1911 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2980 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1911).
147 A.D. 892 (Hovey v. Richardson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hovey v. De Long Hook & Eye Co.
147 A.D. 881 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1911)