Home/New York Court of Appeals/Hovey v. . Richardson

Hovey v. . Richardson

105 N.E. 1085, 211 N.Y. 573, 1914 N.Y. LEXIS 1165
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 2, 1914
StatusPublished

This text of 105 N.E. 1085 (Hovey v. . Richardson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hovey v. . Richardson, 105 N.E. 1085, 211 N.Y. 573, 1914 N.Y. LEXIS 1165 (N.Y. 1914).

Opinion

Judgment of Appellate Division and determination of Appellate Term reversed and judgment of Municipal Court affirmed, with costs to appellant in all courts, on opinion of Hiscock, J., hi Hovey v. De Long Hook & Eye Co. (211 N. Y. 420).

Concur: Willard Bartlett, Oh. J., Werner, His-cock, Cuddeback and Cardozo, JJ. Absent: Hornblower, J. Not sitting: Miller, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hovey v. . De Long Hook Eye Co.
105 N.E. 667 (New York Court of Appeals, 1914)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
105 N.E. 1085, 211 N.Y. 573, 1914 N.Y. LEXIS 1165, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hovey-v-richardson-ny-1914.