Hovey v. Elliott

21 N.Y.S. 108

This text of 21 N.Y.S. 108 (Hovey v. Elliott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hovey v. Elliott, 21 N.Y.S. 108 (superctny 1892).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

- Upon the case as now presented, the right of the plaintiffs to any relief whatever rests upon the alleged decree of the supreme court of the District of Columbia, entered on the 17th day of April, 1878. The referee found that the decree was invalid for want of jurisdiction of the court wherein it was entered to enter the same. The question of the validity or invalidity of the -decree must be determined by the laws of the United States, and by the interpretation of those laws by the supreme court of the United States. Whether a decree' of the same character, made under the same circumstances, by a court of the state of New York or of any other state,' would or would not be valid, is an immaterial question, if, under the decisions of the supreme court of the United States, the decree was one which a federal court was wholly incompetent to make. Upon a careful examination of all that has been cited upon this point by both parties, we are of the opinion that the learned referee reached the right conclusion. The judgment should be affirmed, with costs, upon that part of the opinion of the referee which related to the question of jurisdiction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
21 N.Y.S. 108, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hovey-v-elliott-superctny-1892.