Hoverstock v. Rogers

Supreme Court of Missouri

Hoverstock v. Rogers

144 S.W. 483, 239 Mo. 430, 1912 Mo. LEXIS 86

CourtSupreme Court of Missouri

DecidedFebruary 6, 1912

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 144 S.W. 483 (Hoverstock v. Rogers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hoverstock v. Rogers, 144 S.W. 483, 239 Mo. 430, 1912 Mo. LEXIS 86 (Mo. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

ROT, C.

— The facts in this case are in all respects the same as in the case of Ora "Wrightsman v. John 0. Rogers, the same defendant (ante, p. 417).

Our opinion in this case is the same as in than

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded with directions to proceed with the cause in accord-' [431]*431anee with the opinion in that case.

Bond, G. (sitting in Division Two when this case was argned), concurs.

PER CURIAM.

— The foregoing opinion of Roy, C., is adopted as the opinion of the court.

All the judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI