Hoverson v. Hoverson
This text of 2013 ND 48 (Hoverson v. Hoverson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Filed 4/4/13 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2013 ND 43
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Rustin Dale Bentz, Defendant and Appellant
No. 20120345
Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable David E. Reich, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Jeffrey R. Ubben, Assistant State’s Attorney, Courthouse, 514 East Thayer Avenue, Bismarck, ND 58501, for plaintiff and appellee.
Thomas M. Tuntland, 210 Collins Avenue, P.O. Box 1315, Mandan, ND 58554-1315, for defendant and appellant.
State v. Bentz
[¶1] Rustin Bentz appeals from a criminal judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of being a felon in possession of a firearm, terrorizing, and carrying a loaded firearm in a vehicle. On appeal, he argues the trial evidence was insufficient to support his terrorizing conviction. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Mary Muehlen Maring
Daniel J. Crothers
Dale V. Sandstrom
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2013 ND 48, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hoverson-v-hoverson-nd-2013.