Hovell v. Dowling

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hovell v. Dowling

249 A.D. 777, 292 N.Y.S. 1010, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5969

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 28, 1936

StatusPublished

This text of 249 A.D. 777 (Hovell v. Dowling) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hovell v. Dowling, 249 A.D. 777, 292 N.Y.S. 1010, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5969 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

Action to recover damages for the death of plaintiff’s intestate, killed by a train of the Interborough Rapid Transit Company, of which defendants are receivers. Judgment in favor of the plaintiff affirmed, with costs. The record on this appeal presents a stronger case in favor of the plaintiff than that which appeared on the prior trial. Carswell, Davis and Johnston, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., and Hagarty, J., dissent and vote for reversal and a new trial on the ground that the verdict of the jury is against the weight of the evidence.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action to recover damages for the death of plaintiff’s intestate, killed by a train of the Interborough Rapid Transit Company, of which defendants are receivers. Judgment in favor of the plaintiff affirmed, with costs. The record on this appeal presents a stronger case in favor of the plaintiff than that which appeared on the prior trial. Carswell, Davis and Johnston, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., and Hagarty, J., dissent and vote for reversal and a new trial on the ground that the verdict of the jury is against the weight of the evidence.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

249 A.D. 777, 292 N.Y.S. 1010, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5969, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hovell-v-dowling-nyappdiv-1936.