Hovel v. State

697 So. 2d 1013, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 9187, 1997 WL 464153
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 13, 1997
DocketNo. 97-1294
StatusPublished

This text of 697 So. 2d 1013 (Hovel v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hovel v. State, 697 So. 2d 1013, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 9187, 1997 WL 464153 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm without prejudice to appellant pursuing his administrative remedies with the Department of Corrections concerning the alleged miscalculation of credit for time served. If appellant is unsuceessfiil in ob-[1014]*1014tabling the administrative relief he seeks, he may then file a petition for writ of mandamus against the Department of Corrections in the circuit court. See Taylor v. State, 677 So.2d 75 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).

AFFIRMED.

GUNTHER, POLEN and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Taylor v. State
677 So. 2d 75 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
697 So. 2d 1013, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 9187, 1997 WL 464153, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hovel-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.