Hovel v. Hovel

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Hovel v. Hovel

226 N.W.2d 750, 303 Minn. 552, 1975 Minn. LEXIS 1577

Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided March 7, 1975·No. No. 45140·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We have carefully considered the records, briefs, and oral arguments of the parties on this appeal challenging the division of property adjudged below in a divorce action. We conclude that the underlying findings of the trial court are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. Since our decision would have no precedential value, we affirm without extended opinion.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

We have carefully considered the records, briefs, and oral arguments of the parties on this appeal challenging the division of property adjudged below in a divorce action. We conclude that the underlying findings of the trial court are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. Since our decision would have no precedential value, we affirm without extended opinion.

Affirmed.

Hovel v. Hovel, 226 N.W.2d 750, 303 Minn. 552, 1975 Minn. LEXIS 1577 (Mich. 1975).

Pincite

226 N.W.2d 750 (Hovel v. Hovel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.