Houston v. Strachan & Co.

79 S.E. 495, 13 Ga. App. 582, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 262
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedOctober 7, 1913
Docket4937
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 79 S.E. 495 (Houston v. Strachan & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Houston v. Strachan & Co., 79 S.E. 495, 13 Ga. App. 582, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 262 (Ga. Ct. App. 1913).

Opinion

Hill, C. J.

In this case the bill of exceptions was certified by the trial judge on April 30, and on May 17 was filed in the office of the clerk of the lower court. Not having been filed in the clerk’s office within fifteen days from the date of the judge’s certificate, this court is without jurisdiction, and the writ of error must be dismissed. Civil Code (1910), § 6167; Woods v. State, 11 Ga. App. 383 (75 S. E. 491); Foote & Davies Co. v. Evans, 10 Ga. App. 194 (72 S. E. 1098).

Writ of error dismissed.

Action for damages; from city court of Savannah — Judge Davis Freeman. April 2, 1913. Twiggs & Gazan, Morris II. Bernstein, for plaintiff in error. Osborne & Lawrence, E. E. Abrahams, contra.-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Duhart v. Maddox
199 S.E. 238 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1938)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
79 S.E. 495, 13 Ga. App. 582, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 262, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/houston-v-strachan-co-gactapp-1913.