Houston v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Houston v. State

635 S.W.2d 374, 1982 Mo. App. LEXIS 4000

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 8, 1982

DocketNo. 44800

StatusPublished

This text of 635 S.W.2d 374 (Houston v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Houston v. State, 635 S.W.2d 374, 1982 Mo. App. LEXIS 4000 (Mo. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

SNYDER, Judge.

Movant appeals from a City of St. Louis Circuit Court judgment denying his Rule 27.26 motion after an evidentiary hearing. The motion sought to vacate movant’s conviction, after a jury trial, on two counts of robbery. The conviction was affirmed by this court on appeal. State v. Houston, 607 S.W.2d 183, 185 (Mo.App.1980).

Movant contends on appeal that the trial court erred in denying his motion to vacate. He claims his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to secure certain witnesses’ presence at trial and for failing to present a complete record on appeal.

The findings of fact of the trial court were not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value.

The judgment is affirmed in compliance with Rule 84.16(b).

REINHARD, P. J., and CRIST, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI