Houston v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Houston v. State

113 So. 3d 1026, 2013 WL 2234013, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 8187

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 22, 2013

DocketNos. 1D12-2870, 1D12-3066

StatusPublished

This text of 113 So. 3d 1026 (Houston v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Houston v. State, 113 So. 3d 1026, 2013 WL 2234013, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 8187 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s convictions and sentences without discussion. Any failure in the written probation revocation order to specify the conditions of probation that were violated cannot be raised for the first time on appeal. However, we agree the trial court erred in denying appellant’s rule 8.800(b)(2) motion to correct the written judgment and sentence to reflect that appellant entered a nolo contendere plea to the offense charged in circuit court case number 2009-CF-814. Accordingly, we remand with directions that the trial court enter a corrected judgment and sentence.

AFFIRMED and REMANDED with directions.

PADOVANO, WETHERELL, and SWANSON, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s convictions and sentences without discussion. Any failure in the written probation revocation order to specify the conditions of probation that were violated cannot be raised for the first time on appeal. However, we agree the trial court erred in denying appellant’s rule 8.800(b)(2) motion to correct the written judgment and sentence to reflect that appellant entered a nolo contendere plea to the offense charged in circuit court case number 2009-CF-814. Accordingly, we remand with directions that the trial court enter a corrected judgment and sentence.

AFFIRMED and REMANDED with directions.

PADOVANO, WETHERELL, and SWANSON, JJ„ concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

113 So. 3d 1026, 2013 WL 2234013, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 8187, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/houston-v-state-fladistctapp-2013.