Houston v. State
45 So. 228, 153 Ala. 61, 1907 Ala. LEXIS 203
Opinion
The affidavit was sufficient. — Section 4729 of the Code of 1896. The description of the thing obtained as “two dollars” was sufficient. Form 48, Code of 1896. Nor was it necessary for the affidavit to aver whether the Ivy Leaf Company was a firm or corporation, as it was not the party averred to have [63] been injured. — Headley v. State, 106 Ala. 109, 17 South. 714.
The judgment of the criminal court is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Houston v. State, 45 So. 228, 153 Ala. 61, 1907 Ala. LEXIS 203 (Ala. 1907).
45 So. 228 (Houston v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Headley v. State
106 Ala. 109 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1894)