Houston v. SecTek, Inc.

407 F. App'x 490
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided January 31, 2011·No. No. 10-7022·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This case was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs and arguments by counsel. It is

ORDERED that the judgment of the district court be affirmed.

Appellant Cora Houston, a black female, brought suit under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq., and 42 U.S.C. § 1981 against her former employer, SecTek, Inc., alleging race-based disparate treatment, hostile work environment and constructive discharge. The district court granted summary judgment to SecTek. For the reasons stated in the district [491]*491court’s memorandum opinion filed January 28, 2010, we affirm.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41(a)(1).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Houston v. SecTek, Inc., 407 F. App'x 490 (D.C. Cir. 2011).

407 F. App'x 490 (Houston v. SecTek, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mitchell v. Yellen
District of Columbia, 2018
Krishnan v. Foxx
177 F. Supp. 3d 496 (District of Columbia, 2016)
Jones v. Bush
160 F. Supp. 3d 325 (District of Columbia, 2016)
Massaquoi v. District of Columbia Government
81 F. Supp. 3d 44 (District of Columbia, 2015)
Gray v. Lahood
74 F. Supp. 3d 55 (District of Columbia, 2014)
Swann v. Office of the Architect of the Capitol
73 F. Supp. 3d 20 (District of Columbia, 2014)
Saunders v. Mills
842 F. Supp. 2d 284 (District of Columbia, 2012)
Grosdidier v. Chairman, Broadcasting Board of Governors
774 F. Supp. 2d 76 (District of Columbia, 2011)