Houston v. O'Brien

Fourth Circuit

Houston v. O'Brien

449 F. App'x 244

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 5, 2011·No. No. 11-6829·Published

Opinion

[245]*245Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Eric Houston appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), without prejudice for failure to prosecute. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Houston v. O'Brien, No. 5:11-cv-00052-FPS-JSK (N.D.W. Va. June 17, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[245]*245Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Eric Houston appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), without prejudice for failure to prosecute. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Houston v. O'Brien, No. 5:11-cv-00052-FPS-JSK (N.D.W. Va. June 17, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Houston v. O'Brien, 449 F. App'x 244 (4th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

449 F. App'x 244 (Houston v. O'Brien) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related