Houston v. Mandalay Bay Corp
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
MATTHEW TRAVIS HOUSTON, No. 84418 Appellant,
vs.
MANDALAY BAY CORP, D/B/A
FILED
MANDALAY BAY RESORT AND MAR 3 0 2022 CASINO, ELIZABETH A. BROWN Res • ondent. CLERK OF SUPREME COURT BY
DEPUPi
ttRII
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is a pro se appeal. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; David M. Jones, Judge.
Review of the notices of appeal and documents before this court reveals a jurisdictional defect. The notices of appeal appear to challenge (1) a motion to intervene filed in the district court on March 2, 2022, and (2) a February 28, 2022, district court order denying a motion to amend complaint and a motion to dismiss counsel and appoint standby counsel. This court "may only consider appeals authorized by statute or court rule." Brown v. MHC Stagecoach, LLC, 129 Nev. 343, 345, 301 P.3d 850, 851 (2013). No statute or court rule authorizes an appeal from a motion to intervene or the challenged district court order. Accordingly, this court lacks jurisdiction and
ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.
, J.
Silver
J. J.
SUPREME COURT Cadish Pickering OF NEVADA
10) 1947A c500).
_ocr 358
cc: Hon. David M. Jones, District Judge Matthew Travis Houston Clark McCourt, LLC Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) I947A 4Mta.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Houston v. Mandalay Bay Corp (Houston v. Mandalay Bay Corp) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.