Houston v. Jester's Adm'r
This text of 2 Del. 300 (Houston v. Jester's Adm'r) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
decided that it was not necessary for the constable’s return to set forth that the copy was left at the defendant’s place of abode in the presence of a member of his family. A return of “ served by leaving a copy at the defendant’s place of abode” is sufficient. Gibbons vs. Mason, 1 Harr. Rep. 452.
The defendant below now made affidavit that he was not an inhabitant of the state at the time of the alledged service; and the judgment was reversed on this ground. The affidavit was not denied ; if it had been, the court would have ordered testimony to be taken by deposition on this point.
The act of assembly provides, section 3, (Dig. 332,) that “ service by leaving a copy shall not be made and shall not be of any effect, unless the defendant shall at the time of such service be an inhabitant of, and have a known place of abode in the county wherein the proceeding shall be.”
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2 Del. 300, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/houston-v-jesters-admr-delsuperct-1837.