Houston v. Howell
This text of Houston v. Howell (Houston v. Howell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8 * * *
9 MATTHEW HOUSTON, Case No. 2:19-cv-01371-JAD-DJA
10 Plaintiff, ORDER v. 11 JERRY HOWELL, et al., 12 Defendants. 13 14 Plaintiff, who formerly was in the custody of the Nevada Department of Corrections 15 (“NDOC”), submitted a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF No. 1- 16 1). Plaintiff subsequently filed a motion to add defendants. (ECF No. 5). 17 I. Leave to Amend 18 It appears to the Court that Plaintiff seeks to amend his original complaint by adding 19 new defendants and allegations against them to claims Plaintiff included in the original 20 complaint. (ECF No. 5). However, the motion does not include a complete complaint. 21 Plaintiff’s motion to add defendants (ECF No. 5) therefore is denied. The Court declines 22 to screen Plaintiff’s complaint at this time and grants Plaintiff leave to file a complete First 23 Amended Complaint. 24 The Court notes that, if Plaintiff chooses to file a complete amended complaint, 25 Plaintiff shall file that amended complaint within thirty (30) days from the date of entry of 26 this order. If Plaintiff chooses not to file a complete amended complaint, the Court will 27 screen Plaintiff’s original complaint (ECF No. 1-1) only. 28 2 amended complaint supersedes (replaces) the original complaint and, thus, the amended 3 complaint must be complete in itself. See Hal Roach Studios, Inc. v. Richard Feiner & 4 Co., Inc., 896 F.2d 1542, 1546 (9th Cir. 1989) (holding that “[t]he fact that a party was 5 named in the original complaint is irrelevant; an amended pleading supersedes the 6 original”). Moreover, Plaintiff should file the amended complaint on this Court’s approved 7 prisoner civil rights form and it must be entitled “First Amended Complaint.” Plaintiff is 8 advised to follow the instructions on the form; for each count and each defendant, Plaintiff 9 must allege facts sufficient to show how the particular defendant violated a specified 10 constitutional right. Plaintiff may not amend the complaint to add unrelated claims against 11 other defendants. 12 III. Conclusion 13 It is therefore ordered that the motion to add defendants (ECF No. 5) is denied. 14 It is further ordered that, if Plaintiff chooses to file an amended complaint, as 15 outlined in this order, Plaintiff shall file the complete amended complaint within thirty (30) 16 days from the date of entry of this order. 17 It is further ordered that the Clerk of the Court shall send to Plaintiff the approved 18 form for filing a §1983 complaint, instructions for the same, a copy of his original complaint 19 (ECF No. 1-1), an d a copy of his motion to add defendants (ECF No. 5). If Plaintiff chooses 20 to file an amended complaint, he should use the approved form and he shall write the 21 words “First Amended” above the words “Civil Rights Complaint” in the caption. 22 It is further ordered that, if Plaintiff does not file an amended complaint wit hin thirty 23 (30) days, the Court will screen Plaintiff’s original complaint (ECF No. 1-1) only. 24 DATED THIS 21st day of January, 2020. 25
26 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 27 28
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Houston v. Howell, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/houston-v-howell-nvd-2020.