Houston v. Fellows
This text of 27 Vt. 634 (Houston v. Fellows) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Vermont primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The opinion of the court was delivered by
We think the judgment of the county court should be affirmed, in both particulars. The defendant was employed by the plaintiff to settle a suit pending against him, by a third person, by paying twelve dollars, and he settled the same by giving his own note for thirteen dollars, and the claim was discharged. The suit was fully settled by the note of the plaintiff, and the defendant [636]*636thereby had received money’s worth, and, the general action for money paid, will well lie; and as the plaintiff was limited to twelve dollars, he must be content in recovering that sum, and the interest on it.
The defendant’s claim in offset, accrued from the payment of the money, and this being subsequent to the commencement of the plaintiff’s suit, it is not a legal offset.
The judgment of the county court is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
27 Vt. 634, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/houston-v-fellows-vt-1854.