Houston v. Berkeley Hall LLC

618 F. App'x 177
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 14, 2015·No. No. 14-2372·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Charles Edward Houston, Jr., appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motions for summary judgment, denying Houston’s motion to file responses out of time, and granting sanctions against him for failing to ensure his client was present at his depositions and the order denying his motion to alter or amend the judgment under Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Houston v. Berkeley Hall LLC, No. 9:13-cv-01352-SB (D.S.C. Nov. 14, 2014; Nov. 25, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Houston v. Berkeley Hall LLC, 618 F. App'x 177 (4th Cir. 2015).

618 F. App'x 177 (Houston v. Berkeley Hall LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.