Houston & Texas Central Railroad v. City of Ennis

Supreme Court

Houston & Texas Central Railroad v. City of Ennis

256 U.S. 684, 41 S. Ct. 622

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedJune 1, 1921

DocketNo. 288

StatusPublished

This text of 256 U.S. 684 (Houston & Texas Central Railroad v. City of Ennis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Houston & Texas Central Railroad v. City of Ennis, 256 U.S. 684, 41 S. Ct. 622 (1921).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of § 237, Judicial Code, as amended by the [685]*685Act of September 6, 1916, c. 448, § 2, 39 Stat. 726. See writ of certiorari denied (252 U. S. 583). Mr. Jesse Andrews, with whom Mr. J. L. Gammon and Mr. H. M, . Garwood were on the brief, for plaintiff in error. Mr. Rhodes S. Baker, with whom Mr. William Thompson was on the brief, for defendants in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of § 237, Judicial Code, as amended by the [685]*685Act of September 6, 1916, c. 448, § 2, 39 Stat. 726. See writ of certiorari denied (252 U. S. 583). Mr. Jesse Andrews, with whom Mr. J. L. Gammon and Mr. H. M, . Garwood were on the brief, for plaintiff in error. Mr. Rhodes S. Baker, with whom Mr. William Thompson was on the brief, for defendants in error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

256 U.S. 684, 41 S. Ct. 622, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/houston-texas-central-railroad-v-city-of-ennis-scotus-1921.