Houston Oil Co. v. Patterson

222 S.W. 538, 1920 Tex. App. LEXIS 627
CourtTexas Commission of Appeals
DecidedJune 9, 1920
DocketNo. 170-3177
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 222 S.W. 538 (Houston Oil Co. v. Patterson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Commission of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Houston Oil Co. v. Patterson, 222 S.W. 538, 1920 Tex. App. LEXIS 627 (Tex. Super. Ct. 1920).

Opinion

KITTRELL, J.

This is a companion ease to that of the same plaintiff in error against Olive Sternenberg & Co., defendant in error, 222 S. W. 534, No. 169. It involves the question of the title to the land in the upper part of the area in conflict between the L. Bouillet 320-acre survey and the F. F. Elliott, a senior league survey, while the case of Houston Oil Co. v. Olive Sternenberg & Co., involved the title to land in the lower, or southeastern part of the Bouillet.

The same counsel represent the respective parties, and, except the • title and style of the cases, the briefs are the same, and both cases were appealed upon the same Statement of Facts.

The opinion in the first-named case (No. 169) is treated as applicable in every respect to this ease. Therefore we recommend that the judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals in this case be affirmed.

PHILLIPS, C. J. We approve the judgment recommended in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chittim v. Auld
219 S.W.2d 702 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1949)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
222 S.W. 538, 1920 Tex. App. LEXIS 627, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/houston-oil-co-v-patterson-texcommnapp-1920.