Houston Natural Gas Corporation v. Janak

422 S.W.2d 159, 11 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 53, 1967 Tex. LEXIS 263
CourtTexas Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 25, 1967
DocketB-424
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 422 S.W.2d 159 (Houston Natural Gas Corporation v. Janak) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Houston Natural Gas Corporation v. Janak, 422 S.W.2d 159, 11 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 53, 1967 Tex. LEXIS 263 (Tex. 1967).

Opinion

ON APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

This action to recover damages for fraud was instituted by Victor J. Janak and Janak Construction Company, plaintiffs, against Houston Natural Gas Corporation, Active Heating & Air Conditioning Company, Inc., Ready Power Company, Jack H. Burk-halter, Tom Stinnett and Wayne Lippert, defendants. Ready Power Company failed to answer. After a jury trial judgment was rendered: (1) that plaintiffs recover from Houston Natural Gas Corporation and Ready Power Company, jointly, the sum of $7,500.00, and (2) that plaintiffs take nothing against the remaining defendants.

The Court of Civil Appeals held that the jury findings on certain liability issues are supported by the record, that there is no competent evidence as to the cost of the duct system, power unit and controls, and that the trial court erred in granting Lip-pert’s motion for instructed verdict. It reversed the judgment of the trial court and remanded the cause for a trial of the damage issues alone. 416 S.W.2d 484.

The holding of the Court of Civil Appeals that a partial remand may properly be ordered in a case of this character to enable the trial court to determine only the amount of damage is in conflict with our opinion in Waples-Platter Co. v. Commercial Standard Ins. Co., 156 Tex. 234, 294 S.W.2d 375, but we have concluded that there is no merit in the other points of error brought *160 here for review. In accordance with the provisions of Rule 483, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, and without granting the application for writ of error, the judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals is modified so as to order a remand for the trial of all issues between plaintiffs on the one hand and Houston Natural Gas Corporation and Wayne Lippert on the other. As so modified the judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Redman Homes, Inc. v. Ivy
920 S.W.2d 664 (Texas Supreme Court, 1996)
Great State Petroleum, Inc. v. Arrow Rig Service, Inc.
714 S.W.2d 429 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1986)
Ayco Development Corp. v. G. E. T. Service Co.
616 S.W.2d 184 (Texas Supreme Court, 1981)
Menking v. Bishman Manufacturing Company
496 S.W.2d 762 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1973)
Roberts v. Mullen
446 S.W.2d 86 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1969)
Goodrich v. Tinker
437 S.W.2d 882 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1969)
Pacific Fidelity Life Insurance Co. v. Simpson
434 S.W.2d 116 (Texas Supreme Court, 1968)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
422 S.W.2d 159, 11 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 53, 1967 Tex. LEXIS 263, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/houston-natural-gas-corporation-v-janak-tex-1967.