Houston Floor Company, LTD v. Interceramic, Inc.

Opinion

l)ismissed; Opinion issued September IS, 2012

In The Quiirt ni :i.itzih Fift1! Jitrict nf ixa at 1at1a No. 05-12-00751-CV

hOUSTON FlOOR COMPANY, LTD. AND BILL BILLINGSLLY, Appellants

V.

INTERC ERAMIC, INC., Appellee

On Appeal from the 68th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-I2-00902

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Bridges, Richter, and Lang

The Court has before it appellants’ August 21, 2012 motion to dismiss appeal. In the motion,

which is unopposed, appellants state that the parties have reached a settlement agreement and ask

that the appeal he dismissed. We GRANT the motion and I)ISMISS the appeal. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 411(a).

PER CIJRIAM

120751 F.P05 Qtinrt øf ppiats Fift1i Jitrict uf ixzt at JaLhu

JUDGMENT HOUSTON FLOOR COMPANY, LTD. Appeal from the 68th Judicial District Court AND BILL BILLINGSLEY Appellants of Dallas County, Texas. (TrCtNo. DC12 00902), No. 05l2M075l-CV V Opinion delivered per curiam before Justices l3ridges, Richter, and Lang. INTERCERAM IC. INC., Appellee

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is 1)ISMISSED. The parties are ORDERED to bear their own costs of appeal.

Judgment entered September 15, 2012.